Comments on: MSN Search Continues to Fall Short With New and Not So Improved UI http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/ It's Just Links Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:47:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Russ Jones http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/comment-page-1/#comment-515 Russ Jones Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:31:02 +0000 http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/#comment-515 This latest "Brrreeeport" challenge by Scobleizer <a href="http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/02/13/the-brrreeeport-report/" rel="nofollow">http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/02/13/the-brrreeeport-report/</a> tried to pit MSN against the others. I took it into my own to show just how ridiculously easy it is to outplace anyone on MSN with a good keyword based domain name. Brrreeeport.us is #2, second only to the original posting by Scoble himself. Technorati's tracking page, a humble #3 This latest “Brrreeeport” challenge by Scobleizer http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/02/13/the-brrreeeport-report/ tried to pit MSN against the others.

I took it into my own to show just how ridiculously easy it is to outplace anyone on MSN with a good keyword based domain name.

Brrreeeport.us is #2, second only to the original posting by Scoble himself.

Technorati’s tracking page, a humble #3

]]> By: chris http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/comment-page-1/#comment-514 chris Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:14:56 +0000 http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/#comment-514 You would THINK that M$ could afford to do more testing but as we all know M$ doens't play well with others. I'd wager that things work fine with M$ products, but they could care less about anything else (ie; Firefox, etc). Yes I do think that M$ will slowly die in the face of smarter, quicker & innovative companies. I would say "more" innovative, but that would denote some amount of innovation at M$ and there is none. You would THINK that M$ could afford to do more testing but as we all know M$ doens’t play well with others. I’d wager that things work fine with M$ products, but they could care less about anything else (ie; Firefox, etc).

Yes I do think that M$ will slowly die in the face of smarter, quicker & innovative companies. I would say “more” innovative, but that would denote some amount of innovation at M$ and there is none.

]]>