<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruby Could Replace my Python Crawler Pretty Soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Just Links</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:47:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-98897</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/#comment-98897</guid>
		<description>@Curtis: Here is those polish guy&#039;s test code.  I haven&#039;t run it yet: http://pastie.org/private/jtqfdbloc83wqqnk525mzw</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Curtis: Here is those polish guy&#8217;s test code.  I haven&#8217;t run it yet: <a href="http://pastie.org/private/jtqfdbloc83wqqnk525mzw">http://pastie.org/private/jtqfdbloc83wqqnk525mzw</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-98895</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/#comment-98895</guid>
		<description>@Michael You are correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Michael You are correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-98894</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/#comment-98894</guid>
		<description>@Phil If your crawler is network bound, then you need more pipe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phil If your crawler is network bound, then you need more pipe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-98703</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/#comment-98703</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get it. Crawlers are network-bound; the speed of your implementation language has virtually no importance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it. Crawlers are network-bound; the speed of your implementation language has virtually no importance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis</title>
		<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-98608</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/#comment-98608</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s kind of hard to evaluate metrics without seeing the actual code.  A lot of micro benchmarks aren&#039;t indicative of real world performance.  

Tim Bray&#039;s widefinder project might be a good reference (both your and his are IO bound).  In the end, programmer proficiency is probably the most important factor in speed. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of hard to evaluate metrics without seeing the actual code.  A lot of micro benchmarks aren&#8217;t indicative of real world performance.  </p>
<p>Tim Bray&#8217;s widefinder project might be a good reference (both your and his are IO bound).  In the end, programmer proficiency is probably the most important factor in speed. <img src='http://www.tonyspencer.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-98586</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonyspencer.com/2008/07/28/ruby-could-replace-my-python-crawler-pretty-soon/#comment-98586</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re presuming that your bottleneck was the threading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re presuming that your bottleneck was the threading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

