<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tony spencer &#187; MSN Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tonyspencer.com/category/msn-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com</link>
	<description>It&#039;s Just Links</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 13:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language></language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>MSN Search Continues to Fall Short With New and Not So Improved UI</title>
		<link>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MSN Search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSN released a new UI for their search engine today.  I think it looks a hell of a lot better than the UI we&#8217;ve been looking at for a long time now but it still falls way short.

Greg Boser complains about not being able to see the search box but in my version of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MSN released a new UI for their <a href="http://search.msn.com">search engine</a> today.  I think it looks a hell of a lot better than the UI we&#8217;ve been looking at for a long time now but it still falls way short.<br />
<img alt="MSN Search" src="http://www.tonyspencer.com/mt/archives/dookie.jpg" width="518" height="158" /><br />
Greg Boser complains about <a href="http://msn.webguerrilla.com/usability/">not being able to see the search box</a> but in my version of Firefox it is clearly visible.  I totally agree with him about the annoyance of no OnFocus on the search input field.  Even worse, when I type a search in the search field and instinctively hit the carriage return key (rather than mousing to click the search button) I don&#8217;t get whisked away to the SERP&#8217;s.  No!  I get a stupid javascript dropdown for &#8220;web&#8221;, &#8220;news&#8221;, &#8220;images&#8221;, etc.  I guess it depends which version of Firefox you are running because on my home machine, carriage return does result in submitting the form.</p>
<p>Bottom line: I continue to be disappointed in Microsoft search.  You would think a company with the budget the size of a small country would do more testing and could be more innovative.  A year ago when the first MSN search ads began running in the UK I thought to myself &#8220;Now we&#8217;re going to see the full blunt force of the Microsoft war chest come down hard on the Google empire&#8221;.  Now I&#8217;m wondering if Microsoft may be so big that they&#8217;ll slowly die in the face of <a href="http://www.google.com">smarter, quicker</a> and <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">more innovative</a> competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tonyspencer.com/2006/02/17/msn-search-continues-to-fall-short-with-new-and-not-so-improved-ui/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

